🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy presents a misguided view of Europe. It claims that unrestrained immigration and what it terms "progressive" policies pose an grave risk to the continent's identity. However, this argument rests on a serious misreading of the situation. The true challenge facing the EU is not societal but economic and technological lag.

The Stark Economic Divide Between Europe and the US

Statistics reveal a stark picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by eighty-seven percent, compared to a paltry thirteen and a half percent increase for the EU. During this period, European income per person dropped from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than several leading European economies like Italy and France.

Today, about half of the world’s 50 largest tech companies are US-based, while only four are European.

The Innovation Shortfall: A Critical Problem

This widening economic gap stems from superior efficiency gains in the US, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly US-centric. In the last five decades, hundreds of American startups have grown into companies valued at more than ten billion dollars, compared with just 14 in the European continent.

This gap raises a vital issue: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, where does Europe stand? Most analysts concede it is essentially a two-horse race involving the US and China, with Europe entering at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

A number of key factors explain this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a much more robust and agile network for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, a factor that limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided regulation hamper Europe. A US startup can launch a product under one regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The EU, despite a bigger population size, is divided among 27 different national systems, creating significant internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its capacity for pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Hopefulness

In spite of these hurdles, one can find reasons for hope. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have started to propose serious reform. Notable reports on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the need for major reforms.

Given appropriate policies and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths might enable much higher levels of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses considerable strengths: skilled workforce, top-tier schools and universities, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these elements could unleash a surge of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing next-generation tech, it can still dramatically boost productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now stands at a critical crossroads. As the saying goes, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's slide in innovation has been gradual. However, without bold steps to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.